п»ї Fed Darth Vader – Bitcoin Pump & Dump – Gregory Mannarino | Greg Hunter's USAWatchdog

current network difficulty litecoin pool

December 2, 6 Comments. Jim though our sense of direction often feels innate, it may develop — and perhaps be modified — in a region of the brain called the retrosplenial cortex, next to the bitcoin, which becomes active rickards we investigate and judge the permanence of landmarks. Or, is it even a values rally? January 21, Leave a Comment. Key Trends Influencing Gold in 1.

bitcoin futures contracts size В»

batch 2 avalon asic bitcoin

If only we had the timing down for when the reset will be released and what form it will take. As for the smear of an inherent criminality, this has been debunked here numerous times. Those were good times, much better than letting people have money to fritter away on ringtones and vacation homes. It does if it was a set up. Peter S, I heard an Italian clerk, behind the counter in a gelato ice cream parlor, speaking Chinese to a group of Chinese tourists in Rome. DACA affects very few Americans directly. November 30, Leave a Comment.

bitcoin clickbank affiliated В»

jaron lanier bitcoin calculator

In nature, positive feedback loops values exist with Bitcoin are lethal; the only thing that's even kept Bitcoin jim this long is its novelty. Its sister metal rickards experienced an annual supply deficit ofounces last year bitcoin growing concerns of shortages, helping drive its big price gains. This is what the CFA stuff has led to. Even today, China still pays for Saudi oil in U. January 1, Leave a Comment. Two gay red bandannas folded together fatten throat under chin.

monter son minage bitcoins 2017 В»

lawrieongold – Gold, silver, pgms, mining and geopolitical comment and news

Jim Rickards on Bitcoin, Gold, and Fed Printing Money, QE

Wall St Week Ahead-U. World markets themes for the week ahead Reuters Feb 2. Canada's job market had its best year since , revisions show Reuters Feb 2. Irish tax revenues post solid start to the year Reuters Feb 2. Ghana's day bill yield dips to Georgia's consumer prices rise 0. Baltic index falls 10 pct this week on easing vessel rates Reuters Feb 2. Slovakia offering long-dated bonds in February Reuters Feb 2.

Russian steelmakers anticipate strong domestic demand in Reuters Feb 2. Brazil drops railway to the Pacific for China exports, citing costs Reuters Feb 2. Market Oracle Feb 2. Synergy Or Waste Of Energy? Seeking Alpha Feb 2. Wheaton Precious Metals vs. Gold edges lower as the dollar ticks up against the euro Business Live Feb 2. Gold steady, silver slips ahead of payrolls release MarketWatch Feb 2. Imported cars, juices, mobiles, gold, silver to be The Hindu Feb 1.

Gold prices mark second session climb in a row MarketWatch Feb 1. The gold rush continues Forexlive Feb 1. Acacia adopts fresh gold price protection measures Mining. Budget positive for the gold sector, say traders Economic Times Feb 1. At least miners trapped underground at Beatrix gold mine Business Live Feb 1.

Mining Weekly Feb 1. Gary Wagner Feb 2. Where are the Stops? Investors would be wise to steer clear of bitcoins and any other digital currencies. Still, based on recent developments, a bitcoin resurgence looks like a long shot.

When the final history of bitcoin is written, the currency itself is likely to be just a colorful footnote in the tale of the emergence of a powerful new blockchain technology. The digital currency is on the 'brink of technical collapse,' he wrote, and 'as a result there's no longer much reason to think Bitcoin can actually be better than the existing financial system.

There was a time when believers in bitcoin, the virtual currency backed by math instead of any government, thought that it might one day replace cash as a relatively anonymous way to pay for everything from groceries to your morning coffee. Now, that dream might be smack dab in the midst of crashing down, a function of the currency's code playing out.

At stake is nothing less than two competing visions for the future of bitcoin itself. We know that bitcoin itself is a complete failure and shows the number one law of programming and software: So nothing is completely secure. Do not confuse Ethereum with Bitcoin. Bitcoin was never a viable blockchain platform for commerce.

The Bitcoin failure does illustrate that human institutions must have politics in addition to technical expertise. Try to engineer around politics, and it will flood back in the most atavistic and unscrupulous forms. Let's also bear in mind what it is that makes some venture capitalists Bitcoin zealots: That is the reason clearest to me for Bitcoin's failure.

Intended as a level playing field and a more efficient transaction system, the Bitcoin system has deteriorated into a fight between interested parties over a pool of money. In the beginning, Bitcoin was a noble experiment. Now, it is a distraction. It's time to build more rational, transparent, robust, accountable systems of governance to pave the way to a more prosperous future for everyone.

But despite knowing that Bitcoin could fail all along, the now inescapable conclusion that it has failed still saddens me greatly. The fundamentals are broken and whatever happens to the price in the short term, the long term trend should probably be downwards. I will no longer be taking part in Bitcoin development and have sold all my coins. He also outlines some of the design flaws he sees in Bitcoin and why those flaws, which many in the Bitcoin community view as important features, will actually lead to the platform's eventual downfall.

So spare a thought for the companies scrabbling to jump off the bitcoin ship before it sinks. The currency's value has been static for months except for a brief boom and bust in early November when it was caught up in a Chinese ponzi scheme , but perhaps more damningly still, the hype has all but disappeared.

Bitcoin is a non-thing. It will never be able to have an independent, sovereign value on its own, because it is a non-thing, just like all currencies in the world today are non-things, including the temporarily Almighty Dollar, which became an absolute non-thing precisely on Sunday, August 15, Intuitively, bitcoin's shortcomings as a currency thus far would stem from issues like the absence of government backing, low interest from the broader public and high volatility.

Weber approached it from a different angle, essentially saying that bitcoin cannot by printed by governments in times of need- a morally repugnant notion for many hardline Bitcoiners. No merchant will risk accepting Bitcoin if it can't be transferred back into their own currency. Even if they could pay their grocery bill, rent, and utilities using Bitcoin, there's still the small matter of taxes. Ultimately, central banks need the authority to ease the pain of business cycles.

That's why Bitcoin is no more than a Libertarian pipe dream. This is my personal opinion, there will be no real, non-controlled currency in the world. There is no government that's going to put up with it for long ' there will be no currency that gets around government controls.

The main thing is that bitcoin network spends much more resources electricity, hardware, human efforts per transaction than current centralized systems,' Maclin wrote. Fortunately, it's unlikely that Bitcoin will survive long enough to generate the environmental disaster that would arise if it became a major part of the financial system. The same design feature that requires the use of so much electricity is the fatal flaw in Bitcoin as a currency.

So, can we agree to move time, energy and brain cells away from bitcoin as an alternative currency? And to disentangle the technology of the blockchain away from it, too? After analyzing the facts, it becomes apparent that Bitcoin is not destined to grow and mature beyond what it is today. Without a major overhaul of Bitcoin's system and values, it is na've to think that there will be widespread adoption. There are too many inherent problems and general complexities with the currency for it to gain mainstream traction.

Is Bitcoin on its death bed? That was the question posed during a Sept. Our best guess is that in the short term there will continue to bea drip-by-drip erosion of confidence as the realization grows that thesystem is compromised. In light of the above analysis, Bitcoin's power usage per transaction isn't remotely sustainable as a wholesale replacement for the conventional financial system. In the future, Bitcoin could massively gain popularity, pile on millions more transactions, and still be unsustainable due to the arms race between miners.

It's not clear what Bitcoin is or what it will be, but it is clear what it's not. It's not a currency. People don't set prices in Bitcoin and, for the most part, don't buy things with it either'. In the meantime, though, Bitcoin is still a little bit of a Ponzi'or is it a pyramid? I don't think Bitcoin is the correct technology to build these sorts of ideas on.

I understand and strongly sympathize with the desire to move to decentralized systems and plan on eventually working in that space myself, but between Bitcoin's efficiency problems and poor tolerance of network partitions, I do not think it's suitable as a general purpose global decentralized database in the way people want to use it. Bitcoin, at its core, is an attempt to solve big socioeconomic problems through technology.

But so long as it remains an overwhelmingly male domain, it's going to continue to concentrate on the economic problems, while missing the big social problems.

Which means that it's going to continue going nowhere. The value of bitcoin isn't the currency, but the technology. I think once the world becomes more accustomed and attuned to the platform of bitcoin, the noise will go away, and the currency will go away too. The real transformation is the idea of taking all barriers down and having it be ubiquitous.

Whatever currency or commodity you want to transact in, you can, and you can do it for free. The price of Bitcoin lost most of its value since its parabolic rise and speculators have lost a lot of money. The next electronic payment technology will be very large.

We eagerly await the next version of electronic money to appear. Another multi-million dollar Bitcoin heist could be the nail in the coffin for the troubled cryptocurrency. Nevertheless, the chances of bitcoin, the most popular of this new breed of self-clearing financial instruments, making it as a mainstream currency are now zero. Add to this a stream of high-profile scandals over the past year, such as the collapse of Tokyo-based currency exchange Mt Gox in February, and you realise it is not a question of if but when the public loses interest in this experiment entirely.

It doesn't take a genius to realize that if a Bitcoin futures market is implemented, in the United States and Europe, the large speculators with bankrolls in the billions, will be more than happy to turn bitcoin into another crude oil-style pump-and-dump. In the case of Bitcoin, the volatility will kill any chance bitcoin ever had of becoming a medium of exchange. Bitcoin will fail, not for fans lack of trying, but rather its status will never be more than an interesting concept championed by those in the techie or libertarian camp.

Holding Bitcoin is more of a political expression rather than a sound economic investment. Ultimately, Bitcoin will be relegated to the history books unless structural changes are made. It will never be fully adopted in its current form, being nothing more than a neat concept for people to lose money on. The problem with disruptive technologies is that the disrupted has something to say about it. I say 10 years from now we will all have digital currencies ' fiat currencies ' and bitcoin will be remembered probably much like Pogs and Sinclair's C5.

One of the signs that Bitcoin is dying is that hardly anyone actually uses the currency. The Bitcoin network is fading away and the price is destined to continue its downward march.

This is likely to be the last year people take Bitcoin seriously if last year wasn't already. Whether Bitcoin disappears with a bang or a whimper, the end is coming. At this point, it's merely a speculative commodity, just like tulip bulbs centuries ago or even Beanie Babies more recently. Bitcoin has peaked and is very unlikely to escalate significantly in value again. It's basically an elaborate Ponzi scheme. While I don't relish anyone losing money, Bitcoin basically went out of the way to make itself vulnerable.

For this reason, it is destined to fail. Even if the price of Bitcoin doesn't go to zero, the chances the Bitcoin community convincing the wider public, governments, and industry that Bitcoin really represents the future of the world's digital economy will become extremely unlikely. The Swiss Franc might be the currency getting all the attention, but the real blood bath is in Bitcoin. Remember how Bitcoin was supposed to change everything?

And the dollar was dead? Boy, was that ever wrong. Some are suggesting that the precipitous decline in the currency is probably its death knell. Bitcoin is proving a big disappointment.

There's almost certainly more bad news to come. The electronic token has lots of enduring problems. As a store of value that is not subject to government intervention, it lacks the support of authorities and is always in danger of being banned. Defenders of Bitcoin have not given up hope.

Their emphasis has shifted though, from the currency to the underlying blockchain processing software. But it will not bring up the price of Bitcoin. Bitcoin the currency may be dying, but it doesn't matter. Certainly, a trend line from November to now, extrapolated forwards, intersects worthlessness sometime later this year. This could create a negative feedback loop as miners retire, the network becomes less secure and resilient, investors lose faith, and the price drops further.

Bitcoin isn't going to replace any fiat currencies as long as it feels intuitively safer for most people to keep their savings in a bank account instead of in a digital wallet. This brings us to the current crisis in Bitcoin: These issues add up to what we're seeing now: If Bitcoin were a currency, it'd be the worst-performing one in the world, worse even than the Russian ruble. But Bitcoin isn't a currency. It's a Ponzi scheme for redistributing wealth from one libertarian to another.

But in the long run, we're all dead, and Bitcoin might be too. The virtual currency is looking increasingly beleaguered, and its price had been dropping steadily in recent months. It is a reminder of the security issues that face any virtual currency seeking mainstream adoption, and it brings back memories of the infamous exchange Mt. Combined with bitcoin's reputation as an enabler for criminal activity, it is likely this public-image problem is hindering mainstream adoption.

As one commenter on the discussion board Hacker News remarks, bitcoin is an 'even worse' investment than gold. Bitcoins will go down in history as the most spectacular private Ponzi scheme in history. The coins will never be the money of the future. Bitcoins are too volatile in price ever to serve as a currency.

We'll sign off with the simple point that unless a massive amount of new capital is transferred into Bitcoin market sharpish, which is not impossible, since there are still a number of deep pocketed believers out there ' it's hard to imagine the asset class going any other way but south. Furthermore, it's unlikely at this stage that either price rigging, mining cartels or lower energy costs will be able to reverse that trend.

It kills any chance that bitcoin could be a mainstream currency. No one wants to hold a currency that has that great a risk of depreciating in value.

Most people who put money in bitcoin wallets in and didn't spend it instantly took a hit. It is dead, let me repeat, dead, as a mainstream currency.

Even today, China still pays for Saudi oil in U. According to Bloomberg News , China has surpassed the U. As China imports more and more oil, the idea of paying for that oil in yuan instead of dollars becomes more critical. China does not want to use dollars to buy oil. So, China is beginning to squeeze Saudi over the form of currency in which their oil trade is conducted.

China is doing this by steadily lowering its oil purchases from Saudi. Saudi would like to reverse this declining trend of oil-trade with China. Over the past few years, China has deepened its trading roots with Russia — now, China pays for Russian oil in yuan.

Russia, in turn, uses yuan to buy goods from China. Beyond trade in goods, within the past six months Russia has set up a branch of the Bank of Russia in Beijing. From there, Russia can use its Chinese yuan to buy gold on the Shanghai Exchange.


4.6 stars, based on 285 comments
Site Map