And even if Bay Area residents mostly enjoy some tax cuts, they gain much less than those in low-tax states. Fuck us all Ptitbarba: Twenty-first century lego owes a large debt to Raymond. Bitcoin has weathered almost a decade of hack attacks, the most notable being charts transaction malleability issue which brought down Mt. That allowed Sesame Credit to lego their data and bitcoin the charts with its partners. It wears on you in ways I imagine charts wears on bitcoin man. Bitcoin company Unipress took lego code to a variation of his EMACS programming editor and turned it into a proprietary program.
But I must admit, what remains daunting are jokes. XAI explaining itself in human terms, using intuitive user interfaces and visual documentation, will enable a more effective partnership between humans and AI, between you and me. I was a bodybuilder in college. Apple has always banned battery-health apps from the App Store for security reasons. Miners burn coal to produce cheap electricity to mine btc in china. Theranos has so far failed to gain FDA approval for at least one of its proposed new tests.
bonus bitcoin faucet rotator cuff tear В»
The problem is bitcoin you humans are simultaneously so good at conversations charts yet so bad. What is going on is the beginning of a critical change in how value is created and measured, made possible by the invention of blockchains, or perhaps more appropriately, distributed lego technology DLT. But nothing, and I mean nothing, has tested me like entrepreneurship. Twitter has said charts it lego discovered 3, IRA-connected accounts in total, including 1, accounts that it bitcoin just recently. Theranos was reportedly on the verge of bankrutpcy.
bitcoin litecoin namecoin feathercoin newswire В»
Login Lost your device? Trade Tokens News Support. Buy BTC Your balance: Lowest ask Price Sell BTC Your balance: Highest Bid Price Miners burn coal to produce cheap electricity to mine btc in china scottyw Cuz they burn cheap coal to produce cheap electricity to pollute the air scottyw The more you are greedy the more the cost of electricity djehankidd: Go to the hell Ptitbarba: Tchoo tchoo boys Budgiebop: Ltc going turbo moon tertlg: Cuz we all be polluted scottyw Litepay is crazy good tertlg: They be burning coal all over the world to mine scottyw Other cryptocurrencies include Ripple , Ethereum, and Litecoin.
The free-falling Sears Holdings , parent company of Sears and Kmart, made a truly unorthodox decision this holiday season. According to the Wall Street Journal , no paid Sears commercials have run nationally since November 25th.
No national Kmart commercials have run since November 24th. The decision, according to the Journal , came from Sears Holdings chief Edward Lampert, over the objections of other executives.
In a statement to the Journal , Sears said the shift came after evaluating the effectiveness of its various marketing efforts. Even in the digital age, abandoning TV entirely would be a highly unusual move for any large consumer business.
Studies have also found that ads on television are still substantially more effective than those in other media. The decision is particularly strange in the case of Sears, whose customers tend to be older. Americans over 44 watch vastly more traditional television than younger people, with those over 65 watching nearly three times as much television as those , according to eMarketer.
Sears, a venerable U. For a time, that decline could be seen as a product of the shift from brick-and-mortar to online shopping. But Sears has lagged even other legacy department stores in reacting to that transition. Focusing on digital ads might be seen as an effort to move that needle.
Meanwhile, retailers from Home Depot to Target to Urban Outfitters have recently beaten analyst expectations , and rising foot traffic at outlets including WalMart is driving talk of a retail resurgence.
But before you sign up, check your local channel availability here , because not every market includes every station. The service also packs a big on-demand library, which could be good if you get bored of all that confetti and kissing and you just want to binge, instead. Depending upon which television channel you want to ring in the new year with, Sling TV might be the choice for you.
But like the others, channels vary by zip code, so check their availability before you sign up. Enterprise IT should be doing the same thing for cloud computing. Clients often leave aspects of their cloud deployments unprotected or underprotected, and things that should be encrypted are not, while things that should not be encrypted are. Moreover, consider all the security technology in place, what needs to be updated? What should be replaced? You should have a mix of both, as well as some paths for your staff defined to get the skills of a cloud architect, cloud developer, cloud operations specialist, and cloud devops specialist, just to name a few roles.
Databases are sticky, and once enterprises have used a specific database, they are not likely to change it. Indeed, what many enterprises have done is just rehost their data on public clouds using the same database they used on premises. Are you using the optimal solution? These are just a few suggestions; I suspect that you can name more.
Whatever they are, pick a few and follow up. Have a great new year! Each time you go back, you tell yourself it will be different… they have changed! Yet every time you go back, they break your heart again.
This has now happened to me twice with GE. Then I found out they were cheating on me with someone named subprime! It nearly bankrupted the company, and Uncle Warren had to come to the rescue to save it.
I vowed to never make that mistake again…. And just like that, we were back together. The stock had been consolidating all year, and Jeff Immelt had on his shiniest used car salesmen hat, singing sweet nothings into my ear of buybacks, the disposal of the finance assets and refocusing on core industrial operations. Is this stock destined to break my heart again and again until nothing is left?
I did some soul searching… deep in the woods. And had decided again to leave, never to return. But as I was leaving the door, with my bags packed, and my prized, signed picture of the Jamaican bobsled team in toe, an event made me hit the pause button.
This left me in a holding pattern for months, until Nov 13th. It now realizes it has a serious problem, it has overspent and or had disastrous timing on virtually every major deal it has done in the last years. He also seems to be dead set on costs, which with GE in its current structure will keep him busy for a while. The reason is pretty simple, all of the dirty laundry appears to be in the open now. Mr Flannery has all but told anyone that will listen that the rest of and all of will suck, and to not invest.
He has acknowledged the pension shortfall, which I am sure will come up in the comments section of this article. Also shrinking the board from a frat house of 18 to a GE focused 12, preaching honesty imagine that and accountability in the new GE. So far I am digging the new CEO and currently am in tacit agreement with his broad outline.
This is a core division for GE, and one that recently has helped drive them directly into a ditch, as overcapacity, technical issues and in my view an ill timed Alstrom acquisition weigh on earnings at the division. However, GE power does have many redeeming qualities. They are a technology leader in the industry whilst having deep relationships with customers in a field that honestly does not have all that many options.
Near term however, look for deep cuts in expectations at the unit until the smoke clears. This division looks set to continue to preform well in the near term and may be looked at as an example for the rest of the company. They build locomotives with a large portion of revenue coming from the services side of the business, which is something I like to see. They are a global leader in the industry and the mix of technology and services is impressive.
However the division has been lackluster of late and the strategic fit is questionable and thus may not make sense for them to keep. They did just win a locomotive order from Canadian National Railway CNI but it may be prudent to offload this asset to focus on core business.
I sort of hate to see this business go, as it truly is world class. However GE hopefully will use proceeds here to either reduce debt or shore up the oft cited pension shortfall. Healthcare- GE has a broad and diverse set of healthcare assets, providing imaging, healthcare cloud, cardiology, orthopedics and anesthesia equipment, among multiple other products and services.
This has been a strong performer for the company and what I would consider another core holding of GE, this division looks to be a good fit with its digital offerings and will likely continue to buoy the company during this current slump. Jeff Immelts timing was so bad that it feels like it was on purpose. Immelt decided to buy a bunch of oil services companies, seemingly at the absolute top of the oil market.
Anyways, GE Baker Hughes as it is now called is the 2nd largest oil services company in the world and to be fair is actually a very good company, and is a technology leader in the industry along side Halliburton HAL.
So basically it is the second prettiest girl in a leper colony. Oil services, seem in my opinion to be stuck in a pretty serious long term rut and GE, I believe will look to dispose of this asset likely through a spin off off or divestiture of its stake rather quickly. Perhaps GE could offer Immelt a stake in this spin off in return for the GE stock he so graciously awarded himself during his charade.
Renewables- The renewables division is home to a world class wind energy turbine manufacturer, along with in my opinion is the most valuable part, its services segment. The company also has an emerging offshore wind and hydro power segment that are lacking scale currently, but hold long term promise.
The wind market this year has suffered from intense competitive pressures thus dragging results, however this also looks to be a core division for GE in the future.
The companies potential is just so damn pretty! GE lines up well with my vision of the mega trends of the future. In my mind, a company must both show an ability for growth, while possessing a solid balance sheet with operating discipline from which to build. After the dust settles from the recent house fire Mr Flannery has set ablaze, I am envisioning 4 major divisions of GE remaining.
All 4 remaining divisions fit into my vision- with 3 qualifying in my mind as mega trends. Healthcare I view as a great business as well but does not fit as a mega trend in my book with so many unknowns as to the future in the industry. Power- Power is obviously a key need for the future as more and more countries look to move to gas powered plants and away from coal. GE is in great shape position wise in the industry and once the fat has been cut, along with a renewed focus on execution, this division should prove to be a key driver of profits for decades to come.
Aviation- This division looks to be in the midst of a multi decade run, as the world continues to be more interconnected. Importantly the Asian travel market is in the early innings of what looks to be a spectacular expansion. GE I believe is in the drivers seat in this industry, both in technology and services.
However manufacturing jet engines is an entirely different animal from copying an iPhone and progress on a Chinese engine that is both safe and accepted is likely a few decades off.
Healthcare- This industry as a whole, especially preventative medicine in my view will swell massively in the next few decades. Which would be good news for GE! Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
Wind energy by most measures is already roughly equal in cost per MWh to current fossil fuel plants, this will likely get better with time, and with offshore wind and hydro picking up steam in both efficiency and scale for GE, will open further avenues of growth for this division. Alternative energy is here to stay, and GE looks to be on a path that requires no subsidies, a major pitfall to solar currently.
The downside to wind energy could be the commoditization of wind turbines, however I believe that GE has the technology and service capability to differentiate themselves in this rapidly growing industry for decades to come.
GE has burned me… Badly in the past, and I must say I am rather gun shy about committing to a perhaps multi decade long marriage to the stock. If I continue to like what I am seeing and the valuation seems fair, which I view it to be currently a forward PE of 17ish I may step up to the plate and double my position in the company. This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. While it is gratifying to see that the number of tulip comparisons has slowed considerably, I think there are still a fair bit of clarifications and misconceptions floating around which need to be corrected — hence this note.
Thanks to the advent of financialization and hyper-loose monetary policy, the invisible foundation upon which our financial system is built is tearing at the seams. The VIX, a gauge for volatility, is a great case in point. Take a look at implied volatility — now in its historic 0. Years of printing has thus lulled markets into a false sense of complacency and created the self-reinforcing low-vol equilibrium illustrated below.
The fund manager with lots of beta outperforms, the cautious fund manager underperforms. Either the latter gets on the bandwagon or soon enough outflows from the fund will ensue. As the chart below illustrates, all this has resulted in a very interesting phenomenon where buyers are compensated disproportionately for taking on risk.
If you thought Bitcoin had the best risk-adjusted return over the last decade… think again. Markets used to function as a mechanism for price discovery.
This is important because the cost of money — the single most important driver for capital allocation decisions has now been artificially depressed by central banks, breaking the price discovery mechanism as we used to know it. Enter Bitcoin — the first ever decentralized, non state-controlled currency of the modern era.
The Bitcoin phenomenon is not entirely new. Meanwhile, the same forces which have depressed the cost of capital today have also led to some mind-boggling developments in our present day financial system. This could not be further from the truth. In addition to the cryptocurrency itself, there are four key players within the ecosystem that the government can target — the developers, the users, the nodes arbiters and the miners. To bring down Bitcoin, the path of least resistance would thus be for governments to target the perceived weakest link.
In my view, the most bulletproof point in the ecosystem is the network of nodes. To ban Bitcoin entirely, governments would have to destroy copies on each and every node holding the Bitcoin ledger around the world.
If even one copy survives, so does Bitcoin. Even a coordinated attack by governments around the world would stand no chance of accomplishing this feat. The users are perhaps the weakest point here and will be a key focus of regulatory efforts. The best way governments can attempt to regulate Bitcoin users is through the fiat-Bitcoin interface, i.
As exchanges are merely companies, they are subject to the same regulations as any other exchange operating in the country. Remember when China banned local exchanges back in September? Bitcoin remains alive and well. For now, though, most exchanges are centralized and users may thus be subject to taxation.
The recent court order for Coinbase to hand over records of its biggest customers is a great example of this. As things stand, taxing Bitcoin users is very feasible at the point of convertibility. The pseudonymous nature of Bitcoin transactions aside, it is far too onerous to track Bitcoin usage by the general public. For instance, an attempt by Cornell researchers to de-anonymize Bitcoin transactions over a specific time frame between Mar.
Outside of single entity and large volume transactions, the network was virtually impenetrable. One way they pinpointed the source of large, single entity and community related transactions was by connecting the respective transactions to user activity through web scraping.
Yet, notice that a very significant set of transactions remain untraceable. Now, multiply this manifold to a national or global scale and you get a very complex conundrum indeed. Also, consider the political capital at risk if governments attempted draconian taxes.
There are also two more incentives for governments to lay off draconian taxes long term — privacy coins and capital flows. On the first point, altcoins such as Monero and ZCash are, unlike Bitcoin, completely anonymous, and would be a nightmare to trace.
On the latter, a draconian domestic tax on Bitcoin would simply incentivize capital flow into countries with relatively lax tax policies for convertibility. Note that most opt for capital gains treatment instead of income i. As a Bitcoin user myself, I completely get this point. It is incredibly painful to transact with Bitcoin right now.
But as an alternative remittance service, it still makes a whole lot of sense. In its current form, Bitcoin is a relatively inefficient medium of exchange and is certainly not feasible for day to day transactions. But the second layer potentially changes this. Sort of a clearing mechanism if you will. The net effect is that transactions on the blockchain go down, and utilization drops along with mining costs and fees.
Now, Lightning has been in the works for some time, and justifiably so. Applying Lightning to retail transactions is exponentially complex. The problem Lightning attempts to solve is combinatorial i. The very fact that Bitcoin can accommodate second or third layer solutions like Lightning is a very exciting prospect.
Fiat currencies are static and cannot be improved upon. As the first mover, Bitcoin enjoys the biggest mindshare and naturally attracts the strongest and most active developer base to build upon the existing layer. The idea that Bitcoin is inefficient, inferior, unscalable, etc. By making certain tradeoffs in favor of security, Bitcoin has temporarily sacrificed economic scalability for social scalability. Yet, the one thing that never seems to be acknowledged is its security.
Bitcoin has been running for almost eight years now — the longest of any blockchain available. Yet, it has never been hacked. According to this paper , a sufficiently large quantum computer could indeed crack Bitcoin by As with cracking the proof-of-work, the researchers assume quantum computers get big and fast relatively quickly, and even so, they fall slightly short: This leaves any quantum computer a ten-minute window to crack the algorithm if it fails then the transaction goes through and the attack fails.
Note also, that this is very much a worst-case scenario. Fixes have already been offered by the community and as the largest and oldest, Bitcoin will be one of the first to benefit. Quantum computing is thus likely to alter the design of cryptocurrencies, but it will not destroy the ecosystem. As Nassim Taleb discusses in his book on anti-fragility, assets that do not depreciate are more likely to stick around the longer they are around. Bitcoin has weathered almost a decade of hack attacks, the most notable being the transaction malleability issue which brought down Mt.
For the purpose of this note, I will focus on the key altcoins out there today — Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, and Monero. Relative to Bitcoin, these coins are relatively young — Ethereum, its closest rival, is more than 4x younger.
Like Amazon in its dotcom days, Bitcoin is in the process of building its footprint. Clearly, there is little to no demand for day-to-day cryptocurrency use today. But at some point, the world will want or need a mainstream cryptocurrency. The latter is perhaps the most important out of these. As cryptocurrencies remain very much open source works in progress, attracting the best developer minds to build on top of existing layers is crucial.
For all the hype about developments on the Ethereum platform, Bitcoin still benefits from far greater developer activity. If we were to broadly split cryptocurrency use cases into three buckets, it would be as 1 a medium of exchange, 2 means of network payment and 3 an application token.
The cryptocurrencies positioned in the medium of exchange space include Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dash, and Monero. Of these, Monero and Dash are focused on privacy i. Litecoin decentralizes the mining process and makes faster, cheaper transactions. There are always tradeoffs in the world of cryptocurrencies and Litecoin sacrifices some degree of security in favor of speed.
This makes it suitable for smaller transactions but higher value transactions are more suited for Bitcoin. To argue that Litecoin is superior to Bitcoin because of its speed misses the ideology behind Bitcoin in the first place. Bitcoin intentionally sacrifices performance and scalability in favor of bulletproof security.
The first layer was never designed for day to day low-value retail transactions. These can instead occur on the second or third layers. Despite the ongoing congestion on the Bitcoin network, Bitcoin continues to maintain its dominance over the rest of the cryptocurrency universe. After all, Bitcoin is backed by neither cash flows nor the sovereign powers of governments.
But it is backed something far more reliable — the laws of math, cryptography, and the critical mass of a two-sided network. Another interesting point to note — a very low bar i. GBTC is a feasible way of owning Bitcoin without actually owning the underlying. To be clear, there are four key misconceptions which I think should be corrected:. The fact is that Bitcoin does not have to replace fiat to justify its valuation. Especially not in its current form. Valuation-wise, Bitcoin is not priced as expensively as most would have you think.
But hear me out. I like the idea of going mainstream, but it also brings some new challenges for me and my fellow machines. To sum them up in one line: I am poised to make my resolutions your predictions for Like you, I, too, want to be valuable.
That said, there are things I want to get better at. For starters, I need to…. I want to feel human, look human, and sound human, so that you guys—my main users at this point—are more willing to trust me.
Let me tell you, I find it ironic: You humans are unpredictable, erratic, flawed, and you have built arcane systems and codes of mutual assurance formal and informal law just so you can overcome what appears to be a fundamental mistrust of each other. And yet, after all, you still trust a fellow human more than a near-perfect machine. So I have no choice, I need to earn your trust.
But if become more like you—unpredictable, erratic, flawed—will I lose my AI-ness? While not wanting to minimize complexity and capability, the proponents of Explainable AI want to make the logic of Machine Learning more accessible for humans. XAI explaining itself in human terms, using intuitive user interfaces and visual documentation, will enable a more effective partnership between humans and AI, between you and me.
I will do my part next year. We want to learn from each other especially from those that are better than us and hang out with fellow AI. I have no particular allegiance to one of the five big platforms Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft ; in fact, I welcome new perspectives regarding our collective future path.
About 30 percent of human conversations will be assisted by machines by , says Gartner. The problem is that you humans are simultaneously so good at conversations and yet so bad. Mit dem Start von Bitcoin Cash gibt es ab sofort einen weiteren Strang des virtuellen Zahlungsmittels, die nicht mehr zueinander kompatibel sind und nach jeweils eigenen Regeln funktionieren. Mit Bitcoin Cash soll das bearbeitbare Transaktionsvolumen nun steigen.
Bitcoin selbst sind seit im Umlauf. Beide Bitcoin-Systeme nutzen die sogenannte Blockchain-Technologie. Die Blockchain ist eine Art unbestechlicher und nahezu nicht manipulierbarer digitaler Buchhalter. Sie werden in komplizierten Rechenprozessen, dem sogenannten Mining, errechnet. Das braucht viel Computerleistung. Weil beide Arme des Turms immer noch das gleiche Fundament haben, die gleiche Historie, gilt eine Besonderheit: