google finance bitcoin symbol
This sort of featureset pushes data as events occur, rather than forcing a website operator to poll JSON-RPC for certain operations to complete. Hence, "push mining" pool the servers pushes new work pro-actively to the miner pool. Without servers miner client for testing, it's about push-mining useful as spitting on a fish Not push-mining realistic now, but "it would have been nice. For each share score is updated by: February 01,
free bitcoin android app 2017 В»
elink bitcoins
By guugll on November 10, in Mining , P2Pool. Hi, Occasionally, poclbm is throwing the following when connected to pushpoold: To simply pass through data unchanged, rather than decoding compressed JSON, comes for free in such protocols. Hero Member Offline Activity: Network-efficient for similar use cases monitorblocks, monitortx where clients connect, and then passively wait for real-time events to be delivered Existing miner client workflows supported, to minimize network protocol change impact on miners Support "push mining," where server delivers new work to miners unsolicited ie. In addition, push mining see below has been discussed as a future alternative to the 'getwork' polling method currently employed.
bitcoin store roger vermaass
Network-efficient for similar use cases monitorblocks, monitortx where clients connect, and then passively wait for real-time events to be delivered Existing miner client workflows supported, to minimize network protocol change impact on miners Support "push mining," where server delivers new work to miners unsolicited ie. What about increase servers interval between requests? Push-mining should be way easier to implementation in pool language, more standard, readable etc. Servers Binary Data Protocol, for mining, monitorblocks, etc. Pool, are you sure your mining push-mining would be profitable?
bitcoin mining with a gtx 670 vs gtx 1050 tiger woods В»
Push-mining pool servers
Calculate a standard transaction fee within a certain period and distribute it to miners according to their hash power contributions in the pool. It will increase the miners' earnings by sharing some of the transaction fees.
The pool's total hash rate is very dynamic on most pools. Over time, as the network grows, so does most pool's hash rates. The displayed values are the pool's relative sizes based on the network: Retrieved from " https: Navigation menu Personal tools Create account Log in.
Views Read View source View history. Sister projects Essays Source. This page was last modified on 3 January , at Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 3. Privacy policy About Bitcoin Wiki Disclaimers. Jonny Bravo's Mining Emporium. Merged mining can be done on a "solo mining" basis [4]. Monitoring new blocks on the bitcoin network is a very easy data broadcasting problem that this binary network protocol may easily support: But with this new protocol's support of JSON, flexibility is not a problem.
A plan to proceed - this is just a rough draft I'm thinking of the following steps to proceed, given the need to coalesce several potentially parallel push-mining efforts: Why invent a new protocol? Why not use Google protocol buffers or XDR? Given the bitcoin community's embrace of JSON, the latter was chosen. Why did you not address glaring problems in getwork? I focused purely on a network-efficient protocol. Uh, it compiles and runs Without a miner client for testing, it's about as useful as spitting on a fish Hero Member Offline Posts: The network would not be destroyed.
Hero Member Offline Activity: Sounds like a reasonable enhancement, especially since the miners will be notified of a new block and will be able to start on the new one right away.
Want to see what developers are chatting about? If I understand the principle, new WORK will be broadcasted with every transaction received by server. And it's often enough. In both cases NAT box just maps the source port. So it is sometimes better to reimplement some TCP features than use its full version.
For example, in this case we don't need an acknowledge for every message. And even though I have not yet time to dive in, solution looks very nice. What about increase time interval between requests? And ban for who will be use the frequent requests. I just read the sources and mixing binary protocol with json compressed data looks weird for me. This should be way easier to implementation in any language, more standard, readable etc. But it still enable push features and will be more efficient because we get rid of HTTP overhead.
Please don't reinvent the wheel. One command can be finished by new line, or better, almost every language has support for streaming JSON well, I know Java and Python libraries , because it is very easy to detect that message is complete.
Because sending work as compressed JSON involves encoding binary data to hexidecimal. It is obviously more simple -- less CPU usage and less bandwidth usage -- to send binary work data directly.