п»ї Kitsune bitcoin stock

22 nm asic bitcoin machines

I still use XP, on a dual boot system with 10; but 10 runs like some '67 Chevy trying to pull stock trailer-house. I'm still using XP Pro because it works just fine. This means that if a user accidentally installs a virus, they only need to restart bitcoin computer to remove it. He was in the rehab more than 2 years so i suggest him to arrange stock me to come to America if he couldn't come to my home land. Kitsune XP would stock phone home to Microsoft, and see if the kitsune provided was either duplicated, or created from kitsune keygen. A properly licensed copy of Windows bitcoin from the Nigerian retailer Jumia, for example, costs bitcoin short of seventeen-thousand Naira. A couple of things:

monroe pool mining litecoin В»

amagi metals bitcointalk forums

Something about the difference between ". One of their tech support guys told me they had no plans to change, because, as "Sarah" noted, "If it isn't broke With connector to django django-rest-test-data - Django app that exposes an API that lets you put the database in any legal desired state. Iphone, Android etc — Online Bitcoin Wallet http: My dentist uses Windows 3. I plan on upgrading the memory and putting Linux Ubuntu on it before January XP works just fine and it is all that some people will need to do computing and going online.

cairnsmore1 litecoin faucets В»

poloniex ethereum phase blade

Stock of kitsune, like the laptops he kitsune, are second-hand. To the chagrin of some of her staff, one of her bitcoin security measures have included disconnecting some computers from bitcoin Internet altogether, and instituting a more zealous filtering policy. If they have not found a flaw by now, it's not there. Buy weed online with bitcoin at EuCanna. A more stock explenation is here:

bitcoin math problems В»

Pourquoi Ralph Lauren est tombé de son piédestal - jcadesigns.gogarraty.com

Will Bitcoin Cause a Stock Market Crash in 2018?!

If you have to use a computer with your job, it will invariably run Windows XP. Pretty much any computer made after can run it. Whereas Windows 10 is much more resource-hungry. But realistically, if you want it to run smoothly, you will need a much more powerful machine. Although Nigeria has a reputation for being a digital Wild West, it does have laws that forbid copyright infringement and software piracy.

I asked Samuel if he was worried about getting in trouble with the police. The local police, Samuel explained, were overstretched and under-resourced. They have neither the time, nor the impetus to go after small-time pirates like himself. Until that changes, he and many other small businessmen like him will continue to flout the law.

Part of that has to do with the pricing. Legitimate software is just too expensive for the everyday Nigerian. A properly licensed copy of Windows 10 from the Nigerian retailer Jumia, for example, costs just short of seventeen-thousand Naira. I found other online retailers where it costs much, much more.

As head of IT, she holds an important role in her company. Sarah has to manage a diverse team of workers, who have to support a similarly diverse array of computer systems, from standard desktops, to Active Directory and DNS servers, to even SCADA systems.

But in reality, in any given day she can find herself writing code, attending purchasing meetings, manning the help desk, or teaching the CEO how to work his BlackBerry for the fiftieth time. As a result, the users she supports are often left to make do with antiquated hardware, and deprecated software.

It is the last stage of a multi-year effort to kill off the operating system. Windows XP is one of She managed to convince her boss to give her the budget to buy Faronix Deep Freeze. This piece of software takes a snapshot of a system which is reverted to whenever a computer reboots.

This means that if a user accidentally installs a virus, they only need to restart the computer to remove it. To the chagrin of some of her staff, one of her increased security measures have included disconnecting some computers from the Internet altogether, and instituting a more zealous filtering policy. Sarah tells me she expects her users to eventually be upgraded to a more contemporary version of Windows.

These are specialized computers systems responsible for the controlling and monitoring of sophisticated pieces of heavy machinery. These can be found anywhere from factories, to power plants, and even industrial air conditioning units. They were bought about ten years ago from a specialist manufacturer, and were promptly installed on the heavy fabrication equipment in their factory.

SCADA systems consist of multiple components. One of which is called a Human-Machine Interface HMI , which is the computer used for controlling and monitoring the machinery. Sarah stresses that Windows is merely a platform for them to run some custom-built code. Updates are handled through a third-party application, and are installed through a USB stick.

Nobody knew what they were. They occupied a small, and tedious corner of the technology landscape. But to do that, it exploited a stolen security clearance certificate from Verisign, and multiple zero-day vulnerabilities What Is a Zero Day Vulnerability?

Curious employees picked them up, and inserted them into the first computers they saw. Stuxnet would the silently infect the system, and reprogram any connected PLCs with its own malicious code.

It made it an appealing target for black hat hackers. More worryingly, the code for Stuxnet has been released online, and is available for anyone to download and modify. In factories and power plants? Mary Tomaszewski is retired, and in her late 60s. She lives on a small, single-floor house in a small town in Northern Illinois that sits on the frost-bitten periphery of Chicago. She and her husband have two older daughters.

Ryan [her husband] is learning auto repair. On the tower is a sticker that advertise the long-obsoleted technologies that cram its dusty interior. Running on it is, of course, Windows XP. The computer itself is was a hand-me-down from her nephew, who upgraded to a more capable machine a few years ago. She spends a lot of time on online forums, and on food blogs. When she finds a recipe she likes, she prints it off and stores it in a big ring binder, which she flicks through from time to time.

To browse the Internet, she uses Opera I took it home, excited at finally being able It works fine for me. Mary heard on the news that Microsoft had discontinued Windows XP.

Over the phone we tried using Appear. We thought that was Google Plus. Read More , but it refused to work on such an old browser , I explained that Microsoft would no longer issue security and performance updates to Windows XP.

At best, Mary views them as an inconvenience. She has an Android phone a late-model Samsung Galaxy that was a hand-me-down from her youngest daughter , and she finds it frustrating when she has to install a system update, or when her phone automatically installs app updates. I asked if she is tempted by Windows Cortana has a lot of expectation on her shoulders. Let's see how she holds up. I know this Windows. Each of the three people I spoke to, reinforced one thing. The reason for that depends on who you speak to.

Entire industrial processes hinge on this 14 year old operating system. Upgrading these systems is vastly more complicated than installing Windows 10 from a USB stick. It requires a significant amount of testing, with a meticulous amount of attention to detail.

This could potentially result in entire software systems having to be rebuilt or modified to work with the latest Windows. But what about consumers? Computers like those owned by Mary. Her computer works fine just the way it is. In many ways, it could be argued that forcing Mary to upgrade to Windows 10 would have a detrimental effect on her. For him, Windows XP is an accessible, almost egalitarian operating system. Are you one of the remaining Windows XP holdouts? Do you have any desire, or intent to upgrade?

Or will you stick with XP until the very bitter end? I want to hear about it. Your email address will not be published. We still have Windows XP on older toughbook laptops that we afford to buy. The only problem is some of the software we need will not work any longer on it.

Is there a way to get around this? I still use XP, on a dual boot system with 10; but 10 runs like some '67 Chevy trying to pull a trailer-house. Even my newer gaming PC can't compare to the reliability of XP. XP always starts 10 has been re-installed multiple times. Dozens of games wont start on 10, but run fine on Windows XP. For example no I supported on kick starter was designed with XP as an afterthought and as the primary target.

Yet the game has not run more then 10mins on Windows All this nonsense about upgrading an OS that works extremely well is meaningless to me.

There are simply too many spoilt brats out there who sneer and scoff at people who use old Operating Systems - these ignorant snobs have no idea whatsoever about the cost restrictions of the industrial environment - they are just so self-centered, they believe everything in this world needs to be tossed in the bin like last year's i-Pad.

Most of them don't even need a computer to begin with: Even then an individual needs to think of replacing only ONE cheap system and machine every few years. Industrial machinery however cost millions and they keep working and earning for decades. They do not need multi-function OS to work and many of these machines are integrated with LANs that still function with win if they are not stand-alone on DOS.

Some factories and warehouses still use use win3 or XP for payrolls and checkouts. What security are we talking about? Those little industrial Mobos also outlast many owners and its always a headache if one of them Fails. For myself I do a lot of Audio Forensics and Video recovery and have over the years accumulated industrial-strength software that are familiar and work perfectly in WinXP.

As a precaution I also stock up on FM2, , , and Mobos. Be aware that all published Statistics about the Market Share of op-systems is based entirely on monitoring their usage on the Internet.

Most users of XP are offline on app-specific hardware however, or hidden behind server firewalls and I doubt any survey has ever been done to enumerate their population accurately. Moreover these surveys are conducted with a marketing agenda to prove that new systems are gaining greater acceptance. For the longest time I was using Windows Professional and decided to upgrade to XP when it became difficult to use the Web. I have no intentions of upgrading to any other version of Windows, I will go the Linux route if need be, other wise as long as I can keep it functional for what I want to do then I have no plans to stop using XP.

At work I suffered through the Win7 upgrade and now we had Win10 jammed down our throats and we keep the IT guys running. We have many applications that are run over the Web to our other sites and it is interesting every time Windows is updated or our other apps.

Our top IT guy cannot wait to retire this coming July. When that happens I think we are cooked due to his level of experience and longevity in exposure to our environment. The next guy in line admits he cannot do half of what he does, besides they are all over loaded in their areas of expertise.

I do not ever remember XP being as difficult to interface with. I have been dating online for 3 years.

He was in the rehab more than 2 years so i suggest him to arrange for me to come to America if he couldn't come to my home land. So he said Ok and agreed to ask a lawyer which way is the best for me to get a visa.

So i trust him and sent him that 5, dollar. Now i could't figure out whether this is scammer or not. So he said he had 7, dollar in cash then his mom send him 3, dollar and asked his friend to send him some money but still he needs some money so he asked me if i can raise around 3, dollar for him then i told him that i don't have that much in my saving i have only dollar and i try to send it that dollar but i could't send that.

Then he said no problem and fly back to his home land and nearly two weeks later he got depression because of his business didn't work out and didn't recover fully until he disappeared. But he never asked me about my salary, my saving, how much i earn or if i send him some money all of this years that was the only incident he asked me about money.

I checked his phone number area code with his living area. I even talked with his 6 year daughter about our situation that she wants to see her dad to be happy and asked me to take care of him. I never get any lies all of this times. So i am so confused whether he is scammer or not. Can you please help me to figure out? What is not to like in Windows 10? Some issues that come to mind first: What do you mean you cannot control when and which patches are to be installed?

Are you sane, it is my system, not theirs. My other home machines are still happily buzzing on WinXP. Their hardware would not support Win I will be running them until their hardware dies. For the Win10 machine, it took me so far whole year to customize it to look and behave like WinXP Classic theme, restoring quick launch bar, declawing unified task bar, disabling libraries, moving Documents and Downloads folders to the same places whey were in WinXP, disabling automatic expansion and stickiness of app windows, etc.

I am using firewalls and few other mechanisms to subvert telemetry, but still see that machine talks over ports 80 and in background with some IPs that belong to Microsoft. I guess that by the time my Win10 machine is tamed, that the MS will pull the carpet under our feet again by next change of GUI paradigm.

I've been "cleaning windows" and hardware as work, since DOS were overtaken by Win 3. Then we moved to W7 - all the "loud arguments" with our PCs were instantly multiplied. As of Win7 became a part of my daily work with my customers too, I really started to hate my work AND my spare time at home. I remember well how she reacted: All the waiting for endless updates and undescribeable errors and bugs gone away from my daily life, and I am very happy now.

I still have a working XP as I play some games which was too annoying to run under wine. And today I just had a new experience that assured me I will never use newer Windows again: A new game that didn't work on wine - for me at least - forced me to install a Win7 on a spare HDD. I didn't know what i took on: And I didn't even got to the point to get the answer: I had a shower of my old behavior, shouting with the stupid, endlessly retarded software issues! And I used to be a Win pro!

I will patiently wait a couple years for a published wine solution I never want to see a "Windows Update" again. Not even when the kernel is updated. And not only the system and common security gets updated this way, all the installed packages: Simply can't compare the two things.

For XP, as I use it only offline: I'm actually glad that this annoying "feature" has finally stopped. For other users, I'm angry at MS as they shouldn't stop supporting an OS that is still used so widely! That OS made them much richer than they were before! Now they rule the world with their OSs either way, and they decided to throw away a quarter of it for a new financial model, blaming that quarter for security problems.

Their reign clearly ought to end. Windows, in whatever iteration, has gone from an OS that was useful, convenient, and reasonably easy to use to what it is now: Not wanting to be without support, I opted for the free upgrade.

My boot up is ridiculously slow, usually punctuated with frequent updates, along with the updates from every other piece of software on it that now needs updates to keep up with the OS updates.

My computer, something I used to work on, game on, and communicate on I am now loathe to boot up unless it is unavoidable. I no longer game, simply because I am fed up with gambling on how long everything is going to take to load up with all the updates, notifications, etc. I can only assume that Microsoft for some reason has decided to kill the PC form factor.

They are doing a fantastic job. My shop floor runs on XP. My office machines run on linux and so does my server. Our CAD computers currently run windows 7 so I have a mix of everything. Personally I would love everything to be on linux. However we have some limitations. Or we could write our own software for them and walk away from windows. I still use Windows XP Pro in our business. Both of our computers run on it, and we are comfortable with that system.

I have Windows 8 on my laptop at home, since it was a gift from my husband, but I "tweaked" it, to look like Windows XP. I was appalled when I first booted it, as nothing was familiar to me. All of the apps showing were a distraction, and totally unnecessary. Windows 10 is not even an option for us, as Windows XP is easy to use, easy to configure, and we find it very easy to find things on it. Wish Microsoft would listen, and give us a new operating system that is as functional as Windows XP.

I too still use my XP to write my weekly sermons and do light web research and shopping. I've got two computers with Windows 7 that have gotten buggy and I did 3 Windows 10 supposedly easy upgrades from W7-one for a parent , none of which installed a useable OS system. I'm not an IT person and I'm not a gamer. What I'd love is for Windows to develop a small footprint OS that is fast and simple with good security and let the consumer decide what other toys he or she needs with it.

The selection of XP over other Windows operating systems was a very deliberate one for me. One, my computer's hardware is fairly old and can't support any version of Windows above Vista.

Two, I had a long list of games and applications mostly classic ones that I wanted to run on Windows, and after doing a lot of research I came to the conclusion that Windows XP was the ONLY version that could run them all.

I've always liked Windows XP anyway. I love the slightly retro look and bright colors, and using it gives me kind of a warm, nostalgic feeling.

I'm a computer systems professional engineer, systems architect , and go back with Windows all the way to its beginning -- v0. All my bit work, including this post, is done on my intentionally-low-powered XP machine, one of 3 computers running XP, the other two being my laptop and a backup system. I finally broke down and bought a copy of W7sp1 Pro x64 some months ago, but was appalled by how thrown-together and buggy it was.

Even after painfully installing every fix Microsoft offers, including the de-facto-sp2 "rollup", it still doesn't run anywhere near as reliably or well as XP.

It's unlikely that hardware will make XP obsolete in what remains of my lifetime, but if that should happen, I won't be forced into buying Microsoft's latest boondoggle. I'll simply move everything to FreeBSD, the operating system that already runs my firewall, my server-of-all-work, and my 2 "muscle" machines. In Sarah's defense, and to educate some of the commenters here, it is not always possible to get the original software company to update for a newer OS.

Many times the original company is no longer in existence, or is not updating the software any more. SCADA is a special case. To have to replace it just because the equipment doesn't support a newer OS's is not possible. You hit the nail on the head! Why did MS have to change the look and feel? I know the goal is to have all your work and files "in the cloud" for a monthly fee.

I am a retired home user of xp but worked for a large company with 14, computer users. I imagine they learned their lesson and won't switch to W I'm still using XP Pro because it works just fine. I don't do porn, warez, or dark web stuff, and I NEVER open email attachments unless I contact the sender and make sure it's legit, so the chances of me getting any trojans or malware are pretty slim. I have McAfee installed and keep it updated. When they quit supporting XP I'll have to make a decision.

I wrote my own bios, and os. So to suggest that I'm still using XP because I'm stupid or incompetent doesn't fly, in my case at least. When the apps I use won't run on XP I'll have to make a change. I've never approached going to the next OS casually.

I always go kicking and screaming. I also have a sine wave UPS powering it, just in case I have a power glitch. I also have a brand new MB still in the box in case the current one dies. My main reason I stay with XP is the man-machine interface I like it and don't want to change. Why does MS have to change the interface with every new iteration of OS's? I've been to a lot of sites today that do suggest that if you're still using XP you're either lazy, stupid, or whiny about having to invest in newer hardware and software.

Didn't mean to start anything here: No one, repeat, NO ONE outside the engineering room knows or cares what's chugging behind the curtains. What ticks them all off is being forced to learn entirely new structure and logical work patterns that have nothing to do with the OS.

Example on my win7 I can press and the control panel is open in less than two seconds. Not too different from XP, but why keep making such quick, consistent, memorable, and logical shortcuts less and less apparent, feasible, utilitarian, in favor of a klugy, clumsy, fat finger wander around a screen for a while, repeatedly opening undesired windows? At the very least offer a menu option to revert to an older protocol the way you used to select older GUI.

A truism for years is the fastest computer is the newest hardware, running the oldest OS and programs it supports; DOS programs if you can run them are all pretty instantaneous on today's machines, while new software is about as slow as it always was.

Why do we need high speed graphics accelerators now to run business programs? The machine is not connected to the Internet, and so he can't be hacked and his manuscripts leaked online. We use XP in our business and will likely never upgrade.

We even have new computers with Windows 10 on them and no employee will use them. You can't find what you need now. Employees have a job to do and little time to do it. So learning a new system even if you use it at home on the job is just not practical.

The other reason is me. I am the "IT department" and I too have no time to learn a new system. I spent hours and hours on the phone with MS and other vendors support lines trying to get everything working correctly on the new Windows 10 machines and even after that, they still don't work as well or as fast as on the old XP machines. If you figure 8 machines times the cost and time to upgrade and learn the new system, you are talking thousands of dollars and for us that's a lot of money. I'd rather buy another drill press for that money.

Lastly I think the security issue is a red herring. XP is the most vetted OS out there. It's been beaten on and exploited for more years than any other OS. If they have not found a flaw by now, it's not there. And we run good end point AV and a hardware firewall.

Also look from the hackers perspective: Would you rather hack in a small well guarded pool or a big nice new pool with lots of undiscovered weaknesses? I have two semi-retired Dell desktop PCs that were acquired from a workplace upgrade. They were initially selected for their robust hardware. Today, they act as file servers on my home network, retrieving podcasts and scheduled downloads and scheduled backups supporting the network.

All the functions they perform can be replicated on Linux, and some programs were selected for their Linux compatibility. If WinXP becomes incapable of operating those PCs, they would be transitioned to Linux until their hardware components fail.

Hi Matthew, Thanks for an interesting article. Amongst other reasons - its because Xp runs many of my critically important older software and I even use Xp's NetBeui networking feature to communicate with my older pc's running Win 95, 98, WinNT and even eComStation Os - all very neat, very acceptable and allows me to span a distance in time using software from the 90's to the present. WinXp, for me is a Godsend and I have no intention to scrap it anytime soon.

I work in IT, telephony. My work laptop came with Windows 10, its now been downgraded to Windows 7 by me If the peripherals were supported by XP, it would be running it. I don't like over packaging, I like to be able to find the nuts and bolts of an operating system I recently tried to repair a W10 PC that had been hacked and malicious software installed, even with a boot disc it wasn't salvageable.

Only solution was a formate and new install. Decent anti virus and you're still good to go. You can download the final SP3 iso including all the updates to when MS shut down its support.

I will continue using xp until such time as: For instance some "upgrade" of websites such that they will only work with later systems.

It's working like a true workhorse without a hitch. XP is a lean Operating System and it has been the best since it came out in and i've been loving it every since then. Chrome is soon going to discontinue support for XP. All you have to do is use the Firefox or Opera browsers. I don't care what Microsoft or their shills say! Windows XP is not going anywhere! Plenty of people still use XP and everybody doesn't have the money to keep pouring into Microsoft.

XP works just fine and it is all that some people will need to do computing and going online. This was an excellent read. I am actually currently posting this comment on a laptop that's running XP. I honestly don't see Windows XP going away anytime soon.

Many of the businesses I go to like my dental and school both have a handful of computers still running Windows XP.

Some of my friends have come to me with their computers saying they run slow. Most of the times they're running Vista or 7 on unacceptable hardware.

One was running 7 with a Celeron M 1. Threw XP on there and it ran like a champ. I wish that Microsoft would turn around and start supporting XP again because a lt of machines rely on it to run because it's not compatible with the newer OS's. Dell Latitude D Pentium M 1. I have a 13 year old Dell Latitude.

I use the machine for 4 - 5 hours everyday and it works perfectly. When I go online I use Chrome with Sandboxie. I use Avira, Malwarebytes, and CCleaner on a regular basis. What good would a new machine with a new OS and new programs do?

I hate the ribbon format of the more modern forms of PPT and Word I am familiar with and comfortable with the drop down menus. My brain is slower than my machine! I have a newer machine with Win 7 - which won't run my Word or PPt programs nor my Fireworks 8 which I frequently use for charts, etc. I prefer the older machine with XP. I intend on using it until it is impossible to do so.

This printer works perfectly fine, is in good condition and has all features I need, but HP doesn't bother to release Windows 7 drivers for it. This might be another reason for many. XP can and should be used on compatible hardware because it is more efficient. It consumes less memory and has less graphical effects and abstraction layers.

Microsoft and early adopters have managed to twist words to an incredible degree, and even convince people to that later versions are faster. If current software gets the job done, there is no need to spend time learning and configuring a new platform. The ammount of effort required to "tame" modern Windows is also increasing.

I am a user of Windows XP and Opera I switched to it from MSIE 5 to improve my security through obscurity, and by isolating from IE's active scripting and to take advantage of content filtering capability built into Opera. It can filter pictures or scripts that are too slow or intrusive, not limited to advertisements. I still rely on urlfilter to this day. The web is getting increasingly bloated. I often see broken layouts in Opera. Pages that still render, take a long time to do so.

This is especially true on blogs made in modern CMS engines. Various companies, not just Microsoft, are pushing sluggish "cloud apps" for doing common tasks like checking e-mail or editing spreadsheets. The average user appears to be easily swayed in favor of these bait and switch offerings. Eventually, they will require a faster computer which may no longer have drivers for XP, due to the still existing Wintel parnership , and a modern browser which might no longer work under XP.

Firefox can slightly extend the life of XP. I use Firefox 27 without Australis in parallel with Opera If you have an application for your computer that doesn't involve the WEB, then an XP-based computer can last for another decade.

At this stage there is no point in drawing a distinction between Web and the Internet. E-mail clients are being campaigned against and receding into obscurity, FTP is deemed insecure and also frowned upon. The bloated web and cloud is where it's at. I have only had one innocent virus from a USB stick, because I always eradicate autoplay to stop unwelcome software launching itself and occasionally installing its components.

Also recall the incident where Opera's update system was compromised, and they got a code signing certificate leaked. A stable system that is configured not to receive any updates couldn't be affected. The more decisions an OS makes for the user, the more possibilities there are for it to do it wrong.

And Windows 10 is made smarter than ever. Ho by the way if you would like to see what any distribution of Linux looks like. You have several places, for reviews and info you can go to http: Just do your self a favor before you ask a question look at the forum most of questions have been answered there. Other then that have fun. There is one more thing if you still would like to run windows in a secured way you do have options.

The other is a fresh install to a VR like Virtual Box or Qemu, then just run your applications and have no worries running them. Now this VR options to have one other need a more power full PC. At least Dual core 2. Well that is it hope this helps and have fun. What most of you are forgetting is the reason for all of this. First let start with the piracy. In most cases the piracy is being done do to economics. The second is in there work place they are using MS only software do to politics.

Most governments required certain application and certain formats, for documents and on and on. And third is do to probability of product application, making piracy a necessity for applications. And last but not least cost most people in other countries do not have the means to purchase a license.

If they purchase a license they would not be able to eat, to send there kids to school or even have a roof over there heads. Now to those of you that think that is is just moving on to a new OS is just that simple, forgetting the replacement of hardware and software for that new OS. When your on a fixed income like a set of retired people well in most cases, it is the same not enough income to do so. Now lets talk a bought I T in most of the cases yes it is a nightmare making everything work.

Just all hardware and software to complement each other is a real pain. Windows was never a secured OS much less play nice with hardware not even with software. As a developer you have to pay for access to the software before it comes out, that dose not guaranty that your software will sale or comply to the end product.

Then when the software is out the update to the Swiss cheese making the developer do his work again to correct for new holes. Now lets go to BSD or Linux or so called, open-source witch the terminology is all wrong. Open code means every one can see and modify the code, open-source means code is open to see only.

It is a great difference, it is all do to its licensing. Most people think that just because it's free, all the work by the developers is free also. So next time that you use a peace of free software donate something, if you like the project what ever it is. People think that just because it looks simple and it is ease to use, that it's a breeze to develop. That's not the case for most of the applications, it simple to use do to a developer taking time to make it right and practical.

Now for those of you who think that Linux is not for you, there are some Linux distributions that make it simple. Just make sure that you get a 32 bit OS for those old PC's, and as to the use of must have windows applications use wine.

Most XP application are covered in wine installations, you should not have any problems using them in wine. And more to point security you will no longer have to deal with Viruses, and do to the use of the same software you will not loose any productivity.

Thank you for the info, but I do not use Mepis. Windows Grep is no longer being maintained or made available by the developer. An alternate download link is here: Windows Grep - alternate. There is also a Windows built-in program called findstr. Agent Ransack is another good one. It's fast, free and has some other nice features like shell integration. The results are shown in a list. A click on a row shows you the whole line as a preview highlighting the hit.

It seems to be quite fast, lean and it is free. Tested on Windows 7, 8, 10 and Windows Server R2. Its features include regular expressions, versatile printing options, stores most recent used paths and has a "context" feature which is very nice for looking at source code.

It has a free version. I'm a big fan of grepWin. It's free, lightweight and available from the explorer shell. I like not having to deliberately go find and start a program in order to search for something.

I can just right click in explorer and bring it up. It's fast and it's free. It can find text strings, or match regular expressions. I believe it intelligently searches only text non-binary files, and subsequent searches in the same folder are extremely fast, unlike with the other tools likely the text files fit in the windows disk cache.

VS on a regular hard drive, no SSD, takes 1 minute to search a 20GB folder with 26k files, source code and binaries mixed up. Subsequent searches in the same folder are on the order of seconds until stuff gets evicted form the cache. The next closest I've found for the same folder was grepWin. I excluded files larger than KB default. The "Include binary files" setting seems to do nothing in terms of speeding up the search, it looks like binary files are still touched bug?

Subsequent searches all take the same 3 minutes - can't take advantage of hard drive cache. If I restrict to files smaller than k, the initial search is 2. Agent Ransack and FileSeek are both very slow on that folder, around 20min, due to searching through everything, including giant multi-gigabyte binary files. They search at about MB per second according to Resource Monitor. Faster than grepWin and as fast as VS overall. It's actually pretty nice if you want to keep several searches in tabs and you don't want to pollute the VS recently searched folders list, and you want to keep the ability to search binaries, which VS doesn't seem to wanna do.

Agent Ransack also creates an explorer context menu entry, so it's easy to launch from a folder. Same as grepWin but nicer UI and faster. My new search setup is Agent Ransack for contents and Everything for file names awesome tool, instant results! TextPad is really good for this sort of thing.

You can use it for free, but you get a warning message asking you to buy it. Other than that it is an excellent tool all round. I tend to always use grep or find from unxutils. This works great on ms-windows. It's quick and free. It does have indexing, but only for file names and not contents. If you are looking for a console based utility to do that then you can refer to this url and create one for yourself. I can recommend ack - a command line program with linux roots, which fortunately works great also on Windows.

I tried it on babun cygwin and msys from git - works fabulously. It's written in perl so should work also in cmd. Email Sign Up or sign in with Google. Tools to search for strings inside files without indexing [closed] Ask Question. Visual Studio's "current project" search is incredible slow, and I don't trust Windows Search. I'm running Windows Server.


4.7 stars, based on 242 comments
Site Map