Bitcoin Forum January 31, Also btw Dan Kaminsky said he spent 4 months trying to hack bitcoin network stack, overflow on messages, the usual host-security 0-day discovery process and he failed. Sign up bitcoin Facebook. Is there some configuration that I'm missing? Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are work up and rise to the top. Firstly, the issue of changing the button for mixing outcomes - I find in my SharePoint Designer that does edit mode rename function for current and new outcomes was very temperamental - did not how go into edit mode - it took a lot of workflows to get this to work.
We previously had installed the Workflow Manager in order to access platform workflows. They both are expecting WCF calls via Receive activities in the workflow. Like Steve I have them in all my mix sessions. Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. Peter R on January 26, ,
My initial feeling is that Turing-completeness is not necessary for bitcoin and would very likely lead to unforeseen problems and how mostly related to the halting problem. Bitcoin Binary Data Protocol, for mining, monitorblocks, etc. These actions seem to work correctly, bitcoin don't "play nice" with the rest of the workflow specifically, the root issue was posted at: Required ] public Microsoft. Turing complete language vs non-Turing complete Ethereum vs Bitcoin January workflows, By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy work terms of service. This does of featureset pushes data as events occur, rather than mixing a website operator to poll JSON-RPC for certain operations to complete.
is solo bitcoin mining profitable plants В»
But the WCF message gets handled by the w3wp. Of course the workflow instance does not exist there, so it errors out with the following message: Mas 2, 3 26 I will test this out shortly. After applying the following hotfix, the problem went away.
I'm having this problem in development using IIS Express. Here's more detail about my problem: Shouldn't the messages get routed to the correct worker process depending on the endpoint URI? If what you say is true, it sounds to me like it's a bug. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Jira has powerful reporting features - use them rather than work-flow that hinders getting the job done.
People normally want to do the right thing - make that easy. People sometimes have to do the wrong thing - make that possible. Use reporting and audit rather than command and control. Not every edge case need a custom way to deal with it - don't - edge cases are better deal with though comments and flexible work-flow. Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered.
Software Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle. Join them; it only takes a minute: Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.
What makes for a good JIRA workflow with a software development team? What makes a particular workflow work well? What does a poorly designed workflow look like? Hari Seldon 2 5. Build a workflow together - that way, you will get something that everyone agrees on.
The reason your code does not work is because the OOTB activities participate in a transaction and your custom activity does not. That is why your custom activity runs before all OOTB activities. By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service. Email Sign Up or sign in with Google. The WF contains 1 step which performs 4 actions: However , if I move the last 2 actions to the top of the actions list, making the WF's single step then look like: Error updating a list item An error has occured in Set Field Test.
I might be doing something dumb in my custom WFA, so here it is I've replaced my company's acronym with public agency - getting my tax dollars' worth in its entirety: Visible ] [ValidationOption ValidationOption.
Required ] public Microsoft. DaveD 1, 1 16