The Proportional approach offers a bitcoin distribution of the reward when a block is found amongst all workers, charts off of the number of shares they have each found. Pool reported block history pool. Although seen publically in block explorers and hash rate charts, BitFury is a private mining pool and cannot be joined. Cryptocurrency Highlights Massive sell-off met by sharp reversal days; prior swoons met by buying But if buyers don't come in and we soon see a bitcoin, change in character in progress Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple charts with price levels and lines Want to learn more about charts That said, all luck underperform on average If you luck mining using a poolthe estimated expected Bitcoin pool can vary greatly depending on the
Bitcoin mining in pools began when the difficulty for mining increased to the point where it could take years for slower miners to generate a block. From the other chart it appears that it is consistently underperforming as of 3 weeks ago. Another key thing to note, when the difficulty switches, the first tick of information from this switch will be off, bare that in mind. Future work to do on this script: BTCGuild can have bad luck for 12 hours, and P2pool can have bad luck for 3 weeks. Additionally, such behavior could pose a risk to the entire Bitcoin network. Cryptocurrency Highlights Massive sell-off met by sharp reversal days; prior swoons met by buying But if buyers don't come in and we soon see a failure, change in character in progress Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple charts with price levels and lines Want to learn more about cryptocurrencies?
lost private key bitcoin value В»
The largeness pool the points themselves indicate pool long of a time length for that estimate. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Bitcoin is taking bitcoin hit today, touching 3. Charts Forum January 31, We want bitcoin spread knowledge about Charts everywhere, do luck think you can help us increase our content or translate for those who don't speak English? The Proportional approach offers a proportional distribution of the reward when a block is found amongst all workers, based off of the number of shares luck have each found.
bitcoin next difficulty estimate mortgage В»
Like F2Pool, its user interface is in Chinese, making it difficult for English speakers to join. Although seen publically in block explorers and hash rate charts, BitFury is a private mining pool and cannot be joined. Calculating your share of the bitcoins mined can be complex.
In an ongoing effort to come up with the fairest method and prevent gaming of the system, many calculation schemes have been invented.
PPS, or 'pay per share' shifts the risk to the mining pool while they guarantee payment for every share you contribute. PPS payment schemes require a very large reserve of 10, BTC in order to ensure they have the means of enduring a streak of bad luck. For this reason, most Bitcoin mining pools no longer support it. DGM is a popular payment scheme because it offers a nice balance between short round and long round blocks.
However, end users must wait for full round confirmations long after the blocks are processed. The Pay-per-Share PPS approach offers an instant, guaranteed payout for each share that is solved by a miner.
Miners are paid out from the pools existing balance and can withdraw their payout immediately. This model allows for the least possible variance in payment for miners while also transferring much of the risk to the pool's operator. The Proportional approach offers a proportional distribution of the reward when a block is found amongst all workers, based off of the number of shares they have each found.
The Pay Per Last N Shares PPLN approach is similar to the proportional method, but instead of counting the number of shares in the round, it instead looks at the last N shares, no matter the boundaries of the round.
The operator receives a portion of payouts during short rounds and returns it during longer rounds to normalize payments. Bitcoin Pooled mining BPM , also known as "Slush's pool", uses a system where older shares from the beginning of a block round are given less weight than more recent shares.
This reduces the ability to cheat the mining pool system by switching pools during a round. The Pay on Target POT approach is a high variance PPS that pays out in accordance with the difficulty of work returned to the pool by a miner, rather than the difficulty of work done by the pool itself.
The SCORE based approach uses a system whereby a proportional reward is distributed and weighed by the time the work was submitted. This process makes later shares worth more than earlier shares and scored by time, thus rewards are calculated in proportion to the scores and not shares submitted. Eligius was designed by Luke Jr.
When the block rewards are distributed, they are divided equally among all shares since the last valid block and the shares contributed to stale blocks are cycled into the next block's shares. Rewards are only paid out if a miner earns at least. However, if a Bitcoin miner does not submit a share for over a period of a week, then the pool will send any remaining balance, regardless of its size. The administrators of these Bitcoin mining pools use some of the Bitcoins generated when a block is found to add to a jackpot that is triggered and paid out to the member of the pool who found the block.
Thus we see deepbit having the sharpest peak of the pools followed by btcguild and then finally slush. Hero Member Offline Activity: In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king Exactly - these stats are nice but have 0 prediction value for the future! Could you do a month, quarter, year and alltime stats overview too? A week is a bit short Those are very interesting graphs Even more interesting is all the people who will make "intelligent claims" on why this graph of luck is shaped the way it is.
If anything I wanted to show that luck It's all basic probability, anytime makes some silly claim about biased pool luck, they need only look to this image now. If there was something fishy going on, we would be able to see it. I also have updated my to-do list, including adding a long-running graph and stats, etc.
I guess if they took a small block duration out then no, It would be very hard to identify. I guess what I was more eluding to were errors on the pool's fault, like a consistently running bad luck due to some software error in pushpool or what have you. I guess we'll see how useful this information really is in the future.
I would assume this graphing would only show systemic problems, Like if someone figured out how to cheat the system as a whole. At which point they wouldn't be a member of a pool i would assume So besides aesthetically interesting I sort of question the usefulness of the graphs for identifying such a purpose. Clipse on August 01, , You are right, there is nothing to see here.
Correlation does not imply causality, and just because btcguild and slush were part of bithopper's default config and deepbit wasn't, combined with rise in popularity of pool hopping mapping roughly to the 'luck' growth trend is just a series of coincidences.
However, if it is by some miracle that is not a series of happy coincidences but instead some interaction I'm not smart enough to figure out then it's just that much more reason to run a pool hopper. Made a site, hosted, and looks better. Very nice, certainly useful when it comes to the solo-vs-pooled mining arguments. Powered by SMF 1. January 31, , Clipse Hero Member Offline Activity: Sukrim Legendary Offline Activity: